There is no longer any credible scientific debate about the basic facts: our world continues to warm, with the last decade the hottest in modern records, and the deep ocean warming faster than the earth’s atmosphere. Sea level is rising. Arctic Sea ice is melting years faster than projected.
The Center, founded in 1985, is an environmental organization dedicated to protecting the environment, enhancing human, animal and plant ecologies, promoting the efficient use of natural resources and expanding participation in the environmental movement.
Thursday, August 08, 2013
Wyoming Dominates Sales of Coal Produced from Federal and Indian Lands
Annual sales of coal produced from federal and Indian lands in the United States ranged between 458 million and 509 million short tons from fiscal year (FY) 2003 to FY2012. Over the same period, sales of coal produced from federal and Indian lands in Wyoming ranged from 356 million to 411 million short tons, 76% to 83% of the U.S. total.
Most of the coal being mined in the Wyoming portion of the Powder River Basin (PRB) is being produced from federal and Indian lands; Wyoming mines in the PRB are the largest in the United States. Total production of coal in Wyoming, as measured by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), tracks closely with the sales of coal produced from federal and Indian lands within the state, as measured by the Interior Department's Office of Natural Resources Revenue. Using these sales as a proxy for production, Wyoming's federal and Indian lands production has been about 82% to 95% of Wyoming's total production over the past decade.
The revenue collected by the federal government from the sales of coal from federal and Indian lands within Wyoming ranged from a low of $303 million in FY2003 to a high of $638 million in FY2012. Under current law, 49% of the revenue associated with onshore federal lands goes directly to the state, and 100% of the revenue associated with Indian lands goes to the respective Indian tribes and individual Indian mineral owners.
Between FY2008, when coal production in Wyoming was at a record high level, and FY2012, coal production in the state declined 10%. Sales of coal produced from federal and Indian lands in Wyoming declined 9% in the same period. The decline seen in FY2009 can be attributed to the economic downturn that reduced electricity demand. The continuing decline through FY2012 reflects slow growth in electricity demand together with a reduced coal share in the generation mix because of relatively low natural gas prices and growing amounts of generation from renewable technologies, especially wind. (DOE-EIA)
Federal Railroad Administration Tightens Oil Shipping Standards
The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) plans to start asking shipping companies to supply testing data they use to classify their crude-oil shipments, saying it is concerned that some shipments are being transported in tank cars that aren't safe enough.
In a letter to American Petroleum Institute CEO Jack Gerard last week, the FRA said it is investigating whether some crude shipments contain chemicals—possibly from the hydraulic-fracturing process used to extract it—that make them more hazardous than their classification indicates.
The agency told the API it also suspects that mixes of crude and other chemicals might be the cause of an increase in damage to tank cars caused by "severe corrosion."
If shippers can't supply their testing data, the FRA said in the letter, it will work with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to test the shipments independently.
Companies routinely add highly corrosive hydrochloric acid to fracking fluid to break down rock formations. They also add certain chemicals to kill microorganisms and reduce friction in oil. Frack fluids are exempt from federal disclosure laws, but some companies voluntarily provide details, and some states require a thorough ingredient list.
The action is the latest by the agency to toughen regulation of the transport by rail of crude oil after a runaway train hauling 72 tank cars with crude oil derailed and exploded last month, killing 47 people and ravaging the Quebec town of Lac-Mégantic. The Quebec disaster follows a number of serious accidents involving hazardous materials and tank cars in recent years that have raised federal regulators' concern.
More than 34 million barrels of crude were delivered to U.S. refineries by train in 2012, a fivefold increase compared with a year earlier, according to the Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the U.S. Energy Department. The volume is expected to increase again in 2013.
The FRA moves will likely pose difficulties for some shippers. Oil producers and refiners are increasingly using rail in Texas and North Dakota, where there aren't enough pipelines to get the crude to markets that will command the highest price.
(WSJ, 8/7/2013, Photo: Getty Images)
In a letter to American Petroleum Institute CEO Jack Gerard last week, the FRA said it is investigating whether some crude shipments contain chemicals—possibly from the hydraulic-fracturing process used to extract it—that make them more hazardous than their classification indicates.
Oil producers and refiners are increasingly using rail in North Dakota and Texas, where there aren't enough pipelines.
If shippers can't supply their testing data, the FRA said in the letter, it will work with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to test the shipments independently.
Companies routinely add highly corrosive hydrochloric acid to fracking fluid to break down rock formations. They also add certain chemicals to kill microorganisms and reduce friction in oil. Frack fluids are exempt from federal disclosure laws, but some companies voluntarily provide details, and some states require a thorough ingredient list.
The action is the latest by the agency to toughen regulation of the transport by rail of crude oil after a runaway train hauling 72 tank cars with crude oil derailed and exploded last month, killing 47 people and ravaging the Quebec town of Lac-Mégantic. The Quebec disaster follows a number of serious accidents involving hazardous materials and tank cars in recent years that have raised federal regulators' concern.
More than 34 million barrels of crude were delivered to U.S. refineries by train in 2012, a fivefold increase compared with a year earlier, according to the Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the U.S. Energy Department. The volume is expected to increase again in 2013.
The FRA moves will likely pose difficulties for some shippers. Oil producers and refiners are increasingly using rail in Texas and North Dakota, where there aren't enough pipelines to get the crude to markets that will command the highest price.
(WSJ, 8/7/2013, Photo: Getty Images)
Wednesday, August 07, 2013
Oil Boom Helps to Shrink U.S. Trade Deficit by 22%
America's trade deficit narrowed sharply in June, driven by record exports and a shrinking bill for oil imports. The trade gap fell more than 22% during the month, to $34.2 billion from $44.1 billion, according to the Commerce Department. Exports notched their sharpest rise since September 2012, hitting their highest level, adjusted for inflation, on record.
The most recent report in part reflects a strengthening domestic energy industry. Imports of fuel oil and other petroleum products fell, while exports of both rose. When calculated in 2009 dollars, the trade deficit in petroleum products fell by almost $2.2 billion from May to $10.23 billion; the trade deficit in non-petroleum products fell by $5.93 billion to $37.38 billion.
The U.S. imports far more from China than it exports. In June, however, imports from China edged down while exports moved up. (WSJ, 8/6/2013)
The most recent report in part reflects a strengthening domestic energy industry. Imports of fuel oil and other petroleum products fell, while exports of both rose. When calculated in 2009 dollars, the trade deficit in petroleum products fell by almost $2.2 billion from May to $10.23 billion; the trade deficit in non-petroleum products fell by $5.93 billion to $37.38 billion.
The U.S. imports far more from China than it exports. In June, however, imports from China edged down while exports moved up. (WSJ, 8/6/2013)
Tuesday, August 06, 2013
EPA Finalizes 2013 Renewable Fuel Standards
Addresses Concerns About the E10 Blend Wall
As part of an ongoing effort to enhance energy security and reduce carbon pollution, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today finalized the 2013 percentage standards for four fuel categories that are part of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program established by Congress. Most of these fuels are produced by American farmers and growers domestically and help reduce the carbon pollution that contributes to climate change.
The final 2013 overall volumes and standards require 16.55 billion gallons of renewable fuels to be blended into the U.S. fuel supply (a 9.74 percent blend). This standard specifically requires:
• Biomass-based diesel (1.28 billion gallons; 1.13 percent)
• Advanced biofuels (2.75 billion gallons; 1.62 percent)
• Cellulosic biofuels (6.00 million gallons; 0.004 percent)
These standards reflect EPA’s updated production projections, which are informed by extensive engagement with industry and a thorough assessment of the biofuels market.
During this rulemaking, EPA received comments from a number of stakeholders concerning the “E10 blend wall.” Projected to occur in 2014, the “E10 blend wall” refers to the difficulty in incorporating ethanol into the fuel supply at volumes exceeding those achieved by the sale of nearly all gasoline as E10. Most gasoline sold in the U.S. today is E10. In the rule issued today, EPA is announcing that it will propose to use flexibilities in the RFS statute to reduce both the advanced biofuel and total renewable volumes in the forthcoming 2014 RFS volume requirement proposal.
EPA is also providing greater lead time and flexibility in complying with the 2013 volume requirements by extending the deadline to comply with the 2013 standards by four months, to June 30, 2014.
A January 2013 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals required the agency to reevaluate projections for cellulosic biofuel to reflect market conditions; the final 2013 standard for cellulosic biofuel announced today was developed in a manner consistent with the approach outlined in that ruling.
The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) established the RFS program and the annual renewable fuel volume targets, which steadily increase to an overall level of 36 billion gallons in 2022. To achieve these volumes, EPA calculates a percentage-based standard for the following year. Based on the standard, each refiner and importer determines the minimum volume of renewable fuel that it must ensure is used in its transportation fuel. (EPA)
More information on the standards and regulations
More information on renewable fuels
As part of an ongoing effort to enhance energy security and reduce carbon pollution, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today finalized the 2013 percentage standards for four fuel categories that are part of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program established by Congress. Most of these fuels are produced by American farmers and growers domestically and help reduce the carbon pollution that contributes to climate change.
The final 2013 overall volumes and standards require 16.55 billion gallons of renewable fuels to be blended into the U.S. fuel supply (a 9.74 percent blend). This standard specifically requires:
• Biomass-based diesel (1.28 billion gallons; 1.13 percent)
• Advanced biofuels (2.75 billion gallons; 1.62 percent)
• Cellulosic biofuels (6.00 million gallons; 0.004 percent)
These standards reflect EPA’s updated production projections, which are informed by extensive engagement with industry and a thorough assessment of the biofuels market.
During this rulemaking, EPA received comments from a number of stakeholders concerning the “E10 blend wall.” Projected to occur in 2014, the “E10 blend wall” refers to the difficulty in incorporating ethanol into the fuel supply at volumes exceeding those achieved by the sale of nearly all gasoline as E10. Most gasoline sold in the U.S. today is E10. In the rule issued today, EPA is announcing that it will propose to use flexibilities in the RFS statute to reduce both the advanced biofuel and total renewable volumes in the forthcoming 2014 RFS volume requirement proposal.
EPA is also providing greater lead time and flexibility in complying with the 2013 volume requirements by extending the deadline to comply with the 2013 standards by four months, to June 30, 2014.
A January 2013 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals required the agency to reevaluate projections for cellulosic biofuel to reflect market conditions; the final 2013 standard for cellulosic biofuel announced today was developed in a manner consistent with the approach outlined in that ruling.
The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) established the RFS program and the annual renewable fuel volume targets, which steadily increase to an overall level of 36 billion gallons in 2022. To achieve these volumes, EPA calculates a percentage-based standard for the following year. Based on the standard, each refiner and importer determines the minimum volume of renewable fuel that it must ensure is used in its transportation fuel. (EPA)
More information on the standards and regulations
More information on renewable fuels
Friday, August 02, 2013
TransCanada Announces Tarsands Pipeline To Its East Coast
TransCanada, the Calgary-based company behind the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, announced that it would push ahead with a $12 billion Energy East Pipeline from Canada’s oil sands to the Port of St. John on Canada’s eastern coast. The new pipeline would carry 1.1 million barrels a day, more than a third more than the Keystone XL would.
TransCanada’s pipeline announcement is an expected but still bold step for the company, which has waited for years for a decision on its Keystone XL proposal to the U.S. Gulf Coast.
TransCanada plans to seek regulatory approval for the project from Canada's National Energy Board by the end of the year, and, if it succeeds, to start construction in 2016. Service to refineries in Montreal and Quebec City would begin the following year and then to Saint John in 2018.
The provinces through which the pipeline would pass will also have a say over the project. TransCanada expects the Energy East project to proceed. Alberta and New Brunswick support the proposal. Quebec's position is unclear.
The new line would supply eastern Canadian refineries and would also provide export capacity through St. John. Some of that exported oil could go to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. The 2,734-mile pipeline would enable producers to ship up to 1.1 million barrels of oil a day from Alberta and Saskatchewan to eastern Canadian refineries. The company has so far secured long-term contracts to transport about 900,000 barrels of oil a day through the proposed pipeline.(Wash Post, 8/1/2013, WSJ, 8/1/2013))
TransCanada’s pipeline announcement is an expected but still bold step for the company, which has waited for years for a decision on its Keystone XL proposal to the U.S. Gulf Coast.
TransCanada plans to seek regulatory approval for the project from Canada's National Energy Board by the end of the year, and, if it succeeds, to start construction in 2016. Service to refineries in Montreal and Quebec City would begin the following year and then to Saint John in 2018.
The provinces through which the pipeline would pass will also have a say over the project. TransCanada expects the Energy East project to proceed. Alberta and New Brunswick support the proposal. Quebec's position is unclear.
The new line would supply eastern Canadian refineries and would also provide export capacity through St. John. Some of that exported oil could go to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries. The 2,734-mile pipeline would enable producers to ship up to 1.1 million barrels of oil a day from Alberta and Saskatchewan to eastern Canadian refineries. The company has so far secured long-term contracts to transport about 900,000 barrels of oil a day through the proposed pipeline.(Wash Post, 8/1/2013, WSJ, 8/1/2013))
Proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas in the United States up sharply in 2011
U.S. proved crude oil reserve additions in 2011 set a record volumetric increase for the second year in a row, according to newly published estimates in EIA's U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, 2011. Natural gas proved reserve additions fell short of setting a record, but still ranked as the second largest annual increase since 1977. Crude oil reserves rose 15% (almost 3.8 billion barrels) to the highest level since 1985, and natural gas reserves were up almost 10% (31.2 trillion cubic feet).
Proved oil reserves, which include crude oil and lease condensate, increased to 29.0 billion barrels, marking the third consecutive annual increase and the highest volume of proved reserves since 1985. Proved reserves in tight oil plays accounted for 3.6 billion barrels (13%) of total proved reserves of crude oil and lease condensate in 2011.
Texas recorded the largest increase in proved oil reserves among individual states, largely because of continuing development in the Permian Basin and the Eagle Ford formation in the Western Gulf Basin. North Dakota had the second largest increase, driven by development activity in the Bakken formation in the Williston Basin.
Combined, Texas and Pennsylvania added 73% of the net increase in proved wet natural gas reserves in 2011. Pennsylvania's proved natural gas reserves, which more than doubled in 2010, increased by 12.7 trillion cubic feet in 2011, contributing 41% of the overall gain in proved reserves. Proved reserves in shale gas plays accounted for 131.6 trillion cubic feet (38%) of total proved reserves of wet natural gas in 2011.
Natural gas proved reserves, estimated as wet gas that includes liquids in the natural gas stream, increased by almost 10% in 2011 to 348.8 trillion cubic feet (Tcf), the 13th consecutive annual increase. (EIA)
Thursday, August 01, 2013
Four Former EPA Adminstrators Support Climate Action
The New York Times
Op-Ed Contributors
A Republican Case for Climate Action
By WILLIAM D. RUCKELSHAUS, LEE M. THOMAS, WILLIAM K. REILLY and CHRISTINE TODD WHITMANPublished August 1, 2013
EACH of us took turns over the past 43 years running the Environmental Protection Agency. We served Republican presidents, but we have a message that transcends political affiliation: the United States must move now on substantive steps to curb climate change, at home and internationally.
The costs of inaction are undeniable. The lines of scientific evidence grow only stronger and more numerous. And the window of time remaining to act is growing smaller: delay could mean that warming becomes “locked in.”
A market-based approach, like a carbon tax, would be the best path to reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, but that is unachievable in the current political gridlock in Washington. Dealing with this political reality, President Obama’s June climate action plan lays out achievable actions that would deliver real progress. He will use his executive powers to require reductions in the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by the nation’s power plants and spur increased investment in clean energy technology, which is inarguably the path we must follow to ensure a strong economy along with a livable climate.
The president also plans to use his regulatory power to limit the powerful warming chemicals known as hydrofluorocarbons and encourage the United States to join with other nations to amend the Montreal Protocol to phase out these chemicals. The landmark international treaty, which took effect in 1989, already has been hugely successful in solving the ozone problem.
Rather than argue against his proposals, our leaders in Congress should endorse them and start the overdue debate about what bigger steps are needed and how to achieve them — domestically and internationally.
As administrators of the E.P.A under Presidents Richard M. Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George Bush and George W. Bush, we held fast to common-sense conservative principles — protecting the health of the American people, working with the best technology available and trusting in the innovation of American business and in the market to find the best solutions for the least cost.
That approach helped us tackle major environmental challenges to our nation and the world: the pollution of our rivers, dramatized when the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland caught fire in 1969; the hole in the ozone layer; and the devastation wrought by acid rain.
The solutions we supported worked, although more must be done. Our rivers no longer burn, and their health continues to improve. The United States led the world when nations came together to phase out ozone-depleting chemicals. Acid rain diminishes each year, thanks to a pioneering, market-based emissions-trading system adopted under the first President Bush in 1990. And despite critics’ warnings, our economy has continued to grow.
Climate change puts all our progress and our successes at risk. If we could articulate one framework for successful governance, perhaps it should be this: When confronted by a problem, deal with it. Look at the facts, cut through the extraneous, devise a workable solution and get it done.
We can have both a strong economy and a livable climate. All parties know that we need both. The rest of the discussion is either detail, which we can resolve, or purposeful delay, which we should not tolerate.
Mr. Obama’s plan is just a start. More will be required. But we must continue efforts to reduce the climate-altering pollutants that threaten our planet. The only uncertainty about our warming world is how bad the changes will get, and how soon. What is most clear is that there is no time to waste. (NYT, 8/1/2013)
The writers are former administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency: William D. Ruckelshaus, from its founding in 1970 to 1973, and again from 1983 to 1985; Lee M. Thomas, from 1985 to 1989; William K. Reilly, from 1989 to 1993; and Christine Todd Whitman, from 2001 to 2003.
Duke Energy Writes Down $360 Million Over Crystal River Plant
Duke Energy Corporation will take a $360 million charge against earnings as part of a settlement with Florida's consumer advocate over how the utility will recover nearly $2.5 billion worth of expenses related to the nonworking Crystal River nuclear power plant. As a result of the settlement agreement announced Thursday with the state's Office of Public Counsel, Duke said it would take a $295 million charge related to the retirement of its Crystal River nuclear reactor and $65 million related to its decision to end efforts to build a new reactor in Levy County, Fla., about 120 miles north of Tampa. Without the agreement, it is likely those costs would eventually have wound up in customers' bills.
The settlement, which still must be approved by state utility regulators, caps at $1.46 billion the amount that Floridians can be asked to pay for Crystal River, which is also north of Tampa on Florida's Gulf Coast. The plant's premature retirement, due the structural problems, was announced last February.
The deal also establishes that the expense won't be added to customer rates until after the utility has quit charging customers for money it is owed for the now-terminated Levy County nuclear project, possibly after 2017 or 2018.
Duke's Florida utility unit said the utility has spent about $1 billion on the Levy County project but so far had collected only $743 million from customers through June 30. The agreement was a good one for consumers and the utility because "it provides long term clarity about how nuclear expenses will be handled. Though it ends ongoing legal wrangling between the utility and the state's chief utility advocate, the settlement means that consumers will pay nearly $2.5 billion for plants or projects that aren't generating electricity.
The utility also confirmed on Thursday that it has received $835 million from a nuclear insurance fund to compensate it for damage to the Crystal River reactor. (WSJ, 8/1/2013)
The settlement, which still must be approved by state utility regulators, caps at $1.46 billion the amount that Floridians can be asked to pay for Crystal River, which is also north of Tampa on Florida's Gulf Coast. The plant's premature retirement, due the structural problems, was announced last February.
The deal also establishes that the expense won't be added to customer rates until after the utility has quit charging customers for money it is owed for the now-terminated Levy County nuclear project, possibly after 2017 or 2018.
Duke's Florida utility unit said the utility has spent about $1 billion on the Levy County project but so far had collected only $743 million from customers through June 30. The agreement was a good one for consumers and the utility because "it provides long term clarity about how nuclear expenses will be handled. Though it ends ongoing legal wrangling between the utility and the state's chief utility advocate, the settlement means that consumers will pay nearly $2.5 billion for plants or projects that aren't generating electricity.
The utility also confirmed on Thursday that it has received $835 million from a nuclear insurance fund to compensate it for damage to the Crystal River reactor. (WSJ, 8/1/2013)
Shell Writes Down $2 Billion in Assets Due to Shale Difficulties
Royal Dutch Shell posted a 60% drop in second-quarter profit, largely because the oil and natural-gas giant wrote down the value of its North American shale assets by more than $2 billion after tax, highlighting the difficulties that energy companies face in finding new oil they can pump at a profit. Shell cited disappointing drilling results at its North American shale assets, which it said turned out to contain less oil than it had hoped.
Shell also dropped its target to produce four million barrels of oil and gas a day by either 2017 or 2018. The company, which produced about three million barrels of oil equivalent a day in the past quarter, will instead focus on financial targets. Royal Dutch Shell wrote down the value of its North American shale assets by over $2 billion after tax after disappointing drilling results.
Shell said it plans to spend about $40 billion this year, up from an earlier projection of about $33 billion and more than 30% higher than last year.
Tthe large oil companies are having troubles that in capitalizing on the U.S. shale boom. After a decline in natural-gas prices hit Shell's U.S. operations last year, the company said this past January that it was trying to move to shale resources that were richer in oil, rather than less-profitable gas.
Shell declined to give the location of the assets whose value was written down. In North America, the company's shale acreage is located in Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wyoming, Kansas, Colorado, California and British Columbia.
Excluding the one-time charges, Shell's profit was $4.6 billion, down 20% from a year earlier. Revenue fell 3.8% to $112.67 billion from $117.07 billion. (WSJ, 8/1/2013)
Shell also dropped its target to produce four million barrels of oil and gas a day by either 2017 or 2018. The company, which produced about three million barrels of oil equivalent a day in the past quarter, will instead focus on financial targets. Royal Dutch Shell wrote down the value of its North American shale assets by over $2 billion after tax after disappointing drilling results.
Tthe large oil companies are having troubles that in capitalizing on the U.S. shale boom. After a decline in natural-gas prices hit Shell's U.S. operations last year, the company said this past January that it was trying to move to shale resources that were richer in oil, rather than less-profitable gas.
Shell declined to give the location of the assets whose value was written down. In North America, the company's shale acreage is located in Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wyoming, Kansas, Colorado, California and British Columbia.
Excluding the one-time charges, Shell's profit was $4.6 billion, down 20% from a year earlier. Revenue fell 3.8% to $112.67 billion from $117.07 billion. (WSJ, 8/1/2013)
Oregon and Washington Wildfires
Wildfires in Washington state and Oregon have blackened more than 200 square miles of terrain across the Pacific Northwest, forcing hundreds of residents to flee their homes. In Washington, some 1,700 firefighters worked to contain a pair of fires that have charred a combined 85,000 acres east of the Cascade Range, destroying at least three homes and several outbuildings.
The so-called Colockum Tarps fire, which broke out on Saturday morning and quickly spread through dry brush near Malaga, had burned over some 60,000 acres of mountain slopes toward the Columbia River by Wednesday afternoon. Air tankers have dropped water and flame retardant to protect neighborhoods and power lines, he said. The Colockum, only about 8 percent contained, has forced 150 people to evacuate their homes south of Wenatchee.
In southwestern Oregon, a wildfire started by lightning on July 26 that had already burned over more than 25,000 acres was threatening 500 homes. Dubbed the Douglas Complex fire, it is made up of four large fires and 55 smaller blazes.
A few minor injuries have been reported among the 1,387 firefighters and support personnel battling the blaze, officials said. Crews were using 11 helicopters, 86 fire trucks, 15 bulldozers and 27 water tenders. (Various news sources)
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
EPA Proposes Rule to Modernize Clean Water Act Reporting
E-reporting initiative will increase efficiency, ease burden for states and improve public access to data
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a rule that would modernize Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting processes for hundreds of thousands of municipalities, industries, and other facilities by converting to an electronic data reporting system. The proposed e-reporting rule would make facility-specific information, such as inspection and enforcement history, pollutant monitoring results, and other data required by permits accessible to the public through EPA’s website.
EPA estimates that, once the rule is fully implemented, the 46 states and the Virgin Island Territory that are authorized to administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program will collectively save approximately $29 million each year as a result of switching from paper to electronic reporting.
Currently, facilities subject to reporting requirements submit data in paper form to states and other regulatory authorities, where the information must be manually entered into data systems. Through the e-reporting rule, these facilities will electronically report their data directly to the appropriate regulatory authority. EPA expects that the e-reporting rule will lead to more comprehensive and complete data on pollution sources, quicker availability of the data for use, and increased accessibility and transparency of the data to the public.
The CWA requires that municipal, industrial or commercial facilities that discharge wastewater directly into waters of the United States obtain a permit. The NPDES program requires that permitted facilities monitor and report data on pollutant discharges and take other actions to ensure discharges do not affect human health or the environment.
Most facilities subject to reporting requirements will be required to start submitting data electronically one year following the effective date of the final rule. Facilities with limited access to the Internet will have the option of one additional year to come into compliance with the new rule. EPA will work closely with states to provide support to develop or enhance state electronic reporting capabilities.
EPA has already scheduled several webinars in an effort to help states, trade organizations, and other interested parties better understand the details and requirements of the proposed rule. Over the next few months, EPA expects to schedule additional webinar sessions.
The proposed rule will be available for review and public comment for 90 days following the publication date in the Federal Register. (EPA)
View the proposed rule in the Federal Register
More information on webinars

EPA estimates that, once the rule is fully implemented, the 46 states and the Virgin Island Territory that are authorized to administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program will collectively save approximately $29 million each year as a result of switching from paper to electronic reporting.
Currently, facilities subject to reporting requirements submit data in paper form to states and other regulatory authorities, where the information must be manually entered into data systems. Through the e-reporting rule, these facilities will electronically report their data directly to the appropriate regulatory authority. EPA expects that the e-reporting rule will lead to more comprehensive and complete data on pollution sources, quicker availability of the data for use, and increased accessibility and transparency of the data to the public.
The CWA requires that municipal, industrial or commercial facilities that discharge wastewater directly into waters of the United States obtain a permit. The NPDES program requires that permitted facilities monitor and report data on pollutant discharges and take other actions to ensure discharges do not affect human health or the environment.
Most facilities subject to reporting requirements will be required to start submitting data electronically one year following the effective date of the final rule. Facilities with limited access to the Internet will have the option of one additional year to come into compliance with the new rule. EPA will work closely with states to provide support to develop or enhance state electronic reporting capabilities.
EPA has already scheduled several webinars in an effort to help states, trade organizations, and other interested parties better understand the details and requirements of the proposed rule. Over the next few months, EPA expects to schedule additional webinar sessions.
The proposed rule will be available for review and public comment for 90 days following the publication date in the Federal Register. (EPA)
View the proposed rule in the Federal Register
More information on webinars
Monday, July 29, 2013
S. 1240: Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2013
S. 1240, the Nuclearr Waste Administration Act of 2013 ia a bill [text] to establish a
![]() |
Ron Wyden |
The Center was one of the first groups to recommend a nuclear waste management agency outside of the Department of Energy via its work with the Nuclear Fuels Reprocessing Coalition (NFRC). (Gov Track)
Sunrise Powerlink Transmission Project
![]() |
Sources: San Diego Gas and Electric, Approved Route for Sunrise Powerlink |
The Sunrise Powerlink Transmission project, which came online on June 18, 2012, adds approximately 800 megawatts (MW) of transmission capability to the Southern California electric grid. The new transmission lines, shown as blue and green lines on the map, will bring renewable energy from Imperial County to San Diego. The additional transmission capability will also help the Southern California electric grid address this summer's capacity shortage that resulted from the unplanned outages at the San Onofre nuclear generation station located near San Diego.
San Diego Gas and Electric, the owner and operator of this transmission line, announced on June 18, 2012 the activation of this 500 kilovolt transmission line. The project cost approximately $1.9 billion dollars and will eventually have a capacity of 1,000 MW.
The Imperial County region has significant solar, geothermal, and wind resources. The transmission line connects two proposed solar photovoltaic facilities under construction by Tenaska Solar Ventures as well as Pattern Energy's operating Ocotillo Wind Energy Facility—all of which are located in Imperial County. The Sunrise Powerlink path is indirect, skirting the Cleveland National Forest and the Campo Reservation as well as other sensitive ecological habitats.
The Sunrise project included the construction of the Suncrest substation (shown on the map at the intersection of the green and blue lines) as well as upgrades to seven other substations along the path through the control area of the Imperial Irrigation District. The project also interconnected with the control area of Southern California Edison's Edison International transmission system.
California imports significant supplies of electricity from neighboring systems, making transmission capability a critical reliability concern. (DOE-EIA)
Friday, July 26, 2013
Utility Bill Payment Scams
Do Not Fall For The Scam
It appears to be going on all over the country
From: Mississippi Secretary of State
Mississippi businesses and residential customers are being targeted by con artists posing as Entergy employees who demand immediate payment for an alleged past due utility bill.
According to Entergy officials, the scammer calls a customer to say the electric bill payment is past due and threatens to cut off utility service within one hour unless payment is made immediately. Customers are then told they can transfer funds electronically, usually using a system referred to as “Money Pak.” This payment processing system is NOT authorized to receive funds for Entergy.
Entergy officials say the scam apparently started in Arkansas in May and then spread to Louisiana. The first reports of Mississippi scams were received late last week from three Jackson-area restaurants.
Entergy Mississippi warns customers not to fall victim to the scam. They remind everyone that Entergy never demands immediate payment of a past due bill.
More information on payment options for Entergy bills is available online at www.entergy.com.
From: Southern California Edison - - Press Release
About Southern
California Edison
An Edison International (NYSE:EIX) company, Southern California Edison is the largest electric utility in California, serving a population of more than 14 million via 4.9 million customer accounts in a 50,000-square-mile service area within Central, Coastal and Southern California.
It appears to be going on all over the country
From: Mississippi Secretary of State
Mississippi businesses and residential customers are being targeted by con artists posing as Entergy employees who demand immediate payment for an alleged past due utility bill.
According to Entergy officials, the scammer calls a customer to say the electric bill payment is past due and threatens to cut off utility service within one hour unless payment is made immediately. Customers are then told they can transfer funds electronically, usually using a system referred to as “Money Pak.” This payment processing system is NOT authorized to receive funds for Entergy.
Entergy officials say the scam apparently started in Arkansas in May and then spread to Louisiana. The first reports of Mississippi scams were received late last week from three Jackson-area restaurants.
Entergy Mississippi warns customers not to fall victim to the scam. They remind everyone that Entergy never demands immediate payment of a past due bill.
- While Entergy does place courtesy calls if a customer is at risk for disconnection for past-due accounts, they are recorded calls made in advance of the cut-off date and are not from live customer service representatives.
- Entergy bills may be paid by phone using a credit or debit card, but only through Billmatrix, a third-party vendor under contract with Entergy.
- Customers should never give personal or financial information to strangers.
- If a phone call sounds suspicious, customers should call 1-800-Entergy (1-800-368-3749) and ask to speak with an Entergy customer service representative.
More information on payment options for Entergy bills is available online at www.entergy.com.
From: Southern California Edison - - Press Release
Utility Bill Scams Continue to Target
Southern California Edison Customers
ROSEMEAD, Calif., July 25, 2013 — Southern California Edison (SCE) is advising customers to be
aware of a telephone scam that demands immediate payment for
allegedly past due electricity bills.
Imposters have been calling SCE customers telling them they
must make immediate payment on past due bills or have their electric service
disconnected. The callers are also demanding that payment be made through a prepaid
cash card. Other forms of fraud involve customers being asked to purchase
prepaid debit cards. Scammers ask for the debit card number and collect the
value deposited on the card.
SCE customers have reported about 800 instances of phone
scams this year. About 150 residential and commercial customers have been
victimized by some form of bill scam with the incidents costing them an average
of $800 to $1,000.
“We ask our customers to be alert to these calls that demand
immediate payment and threaten service disconnection,” said Henry Martinez, SCE vice president of
Safety, Security & Compliance. “Customers suspecting a fraudulent call
should ask for the caller’s name, department and business phone number. If the
caller refuses to provide this information, customers should terminate the call
and report the incident immediately to local police or SCE at 800-655-4555.”
Los Angeles County District Attorney
Jackie Lacey, whose office prosecutes crimes in about 80 cities within SCE’s
service territory, joins the utility in warning consumers about telephone
scams.
“SCE and the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office share a common interest in keeping Los Angeles County residents safe from bill scams and other financial crimes,” Lacey said.
“A first step to preventing financial scams — particularly among the elderly and in ethnic communities — is to educate the public,” she said. “When these crimes do occur, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office is fully committed to prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law.”
“SCE and the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office share a common interest in keeping Los Angeles County residents safe from bill scams and other financial crimes,” Lacey said.
“A first step to preventing financial scams — particularly among the elderly and in ethnic communities — is to educate the public,” she said. “When these crimes do occur, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office is fully committed to prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law.”
SCE also reminds customers to ask for identification when a
stranger comes to the door or calls claiming to be a utility worker. SCE utility
workers will provide verification, including their department and phone number,
when asked.
In most cases, home visits by SCE are scheduled by the
customer and SCE will confirm the appointment in writing. If there are any
concerns, SCE and law enforcement officials suggest having the utility worker
wait outside until their identity can be verified.
SCE customers should also note that:
·
An SCE employee will never ask for money in person.
·
Never reveal your credit card, ATM or calling card numbers
(or PIN numbers) to anyone.
·
If someone calls and requests you leave your residence at a
specific time for a utility-related cause, call the police. This could be a
burglary attempt set up by the caller.
·
Be suspicious of anyone who arrives at your house without an
appointment asking to check an appliance, wiring or suggesting that there may
be some other electrical problem inside or outside your residence.
·
For more ways customers can stay safe, please see sce.com/safety and read the safety tips section.
About the Los Angeles County District
Attorney’s Office
District Attorney Jackie Lacey leads the largest local prosecutorial office in the country. Each year, the district attorney’s office prosecutes more than 60,000 felonies and 140,000 misdemeanors.
District Attorney Jackie Lacey leads the largest local prosecutorial office in the country. Each year, the district attorney’s office prosecutes more than 60,000 felonies and 140,000 misdemeanors.
An Edison International (NYSE:EIX) company, Southern California Edison is the largest electric utility in California, serving a population of more than 14 million via 4.9 million customer accounts in a 50,000-square-mile service area within Central, Coastal and Southern California.
Maryland Governor Releases Global Warming Mitigation Plan
![]() |
Martin O'Malley |
The plan also calls for pushing legislation next year aimed at increasing the recycling rate statewide, because waste in landfills is a source of greenhouse gas emissions. Under the plan outlined by the governor, the state would strive to better utilize or recycle 60 percent of Maryland's government managed solid waste by 2020.
Maryland's county recycling rates already average around 45 percent. Much of the framework includes environmental measures the O'Malley administration already has pushed through the Legislature. They include initiatives to develop offshore wind and boost solar energy policies.
An offshore wind initiative off the coast of Ocean City will take years to develop. It would increase monthly electricity bills for ratepayers by an estimated $1.50 a month, once energy is generated by wind turbines. Environmental advocates note that Maryland is among the states most vulnerable to climate change and rising waters. The state has more than 3,000 miles of shoreline. (Times Union, 7/25/2013)
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Gulf Rig Natural Gas Blowout: 47 Rescued
Natural gas flowed uncontrolled from the Hercules 265 oil drilling rig off the Louisiana coast on Tuesday after a blowout that forced the evacuation of 47 workers aboard a drilling rig. No injuries or fires were reported. The federal Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) says the blowout happened south of Grand Isle, about 55 miles offshore, where the water depth was reported as 154 feet.
Tuesday's blowout occurred near an unmanned offshore gas platform that was not currently producing natural. The workers were aboard a portable drilling rig known as a jackup rig, operated by Hercules Offshore. Hercules said in a news release that it was operating the rig for Houston, Texas-based Walter Oil & Gas Corp.
The Houston-based Talos Energy-owned platform sits over three wells in water 144 feet deep. Energy Resource Technology LLC is trying to seal the well.
Walter Oil & Gas reported to the BSEE that the rig was completing a "sidetrack well" - a means of re-entering the original well bore. The purpose of the sidetrack well in this instance was not immediately clear. Industry websites say sidetrack wells are sometimes drilled to remedy a problem with the existing well bore. It is a way to overcome an engineering problem with the original well. (Times Union, 7/23/2013)
Kior Opens Wood To Oil Plant in Mississippi
![]() |
A new wood-to-crude oil conversion facility opening this week in Mississippi. Source: Kior |
Kior Inc. opened its first commercial-scale plant in Columbus, Mississippi last November to take in 500 tons of biomass a day and transform it into 40,000 gallons a day of gasoline and diesel. The company’s technology uses catalysts to vaporize biomass, removing the oxygen and condensing the remainder to oil that can be refined into cellulosic gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Silicon Valley powerhouse Khosla Ventures owns more than half of the five-year-old company, which is based in Pasadena, Texas.
If you think about the way nature makes crude oil, Kior just accelerates that natural process. Nature does it thermally; Kior does it catalytically. They start with the same material nature started with, compress that process from a million years, or a very long period of time, into literally seconds. They take solid biomass through a single-step conversion to renewable crude oil. And then they upgrade that crude oil to cellulosic gasoline and diesel.
Kior's next plant is planned for Natchez, Mississippi. International Paper Company shut down a paper mill there about 7 years ago. As the pulp and paper industry has continued to go down, Kior would imagine building these conversion units to convert their unused biomass. It's the tops of the trees, the limbs and the small trees from thinning the forest that have little or no market today, and Kior convert that to oil.
Kior sold out their plant in Columbus, Mississippi, before they ever broke ground. Their customers are Catchlight Energy LLC, which is a joint venture between Chevron Corp. and Weyerhaeuser Co., Hunt Refining Co. and FedEx Corp. They see it as the most effective and least disruptive avenue for them to achieve their internal strategic renewable energy objectives as well as their near term Renewable Fuel Standard volumetric obligations [RFS2]. What the companies like about Kior is it's a thermo-chemical process. It's not a biological process. They like the fact that Kior produces fundamentally indistinguishable gasoline and diesel from what they do from petroleum.
Their significant customers will be both integrated oil companies as well as independents that are striving to satisfy their growing renewable fuel obligations under RFS2. In addition to that, there is a tremendous market of energy-conscious businesses, like FedEx, that are looking for cost-effective, non-disruptive, low-carbon, environmentally-friendly fuels solutions to continue to grow their business in a truly sustainable manner. (Bloomberg, 11/8/2013)
Company To Produce Jet Fuel From Overgrown Forest Wood
But Many Other Issues Are Plaguing 4 Forest Restoration Initiation
Concord Blue Energy, a German alternative-energy company, wants to produce 40 million gallons of jet fuel a year from wood harvested in the four overgrown northern Arizona forests. The German company is so confident in its plan that it will start building facilities even before it obtains state environmental permits.
An advisory group of university, non-profit and other organizations supporting the nation's largest forest restoration effort, known as the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI), is supporting the jet fuel production project.
Pioneer Forest Products, the embattled U.S. Forest Service contractor selected to do
the work for the 4FRI enlisted Concord early in the project.
Concord claims that it can produce jet fuel from chips for no more than $2 a gallon, but airlines testing such fuels recently have paid more than $30. Another confounding variable is that Concord isn’t sure what they would be expected to pay for a ton of wood harvested from the forest.
Regardless of the role jet fuel may play in reducing fire threats and restoring Arizona’s ecology, the program aims to reinvigorate Arizona’s timber industry to accomplish a thinning job that the federal government cannot afford to do alone.
Pioneer, which won the U.S. Forest Service contract more than a year ago, has so far thinned about 500 acres near Heber, above the Mogollon Rim. Its contract calls for it to thin 300,000 acres over 10 years, but the company so far has not secured financing for a needed mill and is asking the government’s permission to sell its contract to an unnamed company. Pioneer’s contract is for the first 300,000 acres. An environmental study that could open about twice that much is now under review.
The lack of progress has drawn criticism from environmentalists and county officials who support the program but questioned the contract award. This week, the Center for Biological Diversity called on the Forest Service’s inspector general to look into the contract award and potential shuffling. Forest Service officials said Wednesday that they hope to decide within a month whether to allow Pioneer to sell out.
In other developments, large log piles are sitting idle and would have been hauled off already if a Heber-area biomass electricity plant slated to receive them had reopened on schedule.
Pioneer has not disclosed the company it wants to sell its contract to, but it is incorporated in Arizona, Pioneer says the company has the money to open the $230 million Winslow mill that his company has been unable to get financing to build.
Forest Service officials also have declined to name the company.
The initiative is meant to restore about a million acres of forests to conditions approximating what they were before the last century of fire suppression. Constant firefighting has allowed young trees and brush to crowd the forest and, ironically, threaten worse fires. (The Republic/ AZCentral .com, 7/24/2013)
Concord Blue Energy, a German alternative-energy company, wants to produce 40 million gallons of jet fuel a year from wood harvested in the four overgrown northern Arizona forests. The German company is so confident in its plan that it will start building facilities even before it obtains state environmental permits.
An advisory group of university, non-profit and other organizations supporting the nation's largest forest restoration effort, known as the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI), is supporting the jet fuel production project.
Pioneer Forest Products, the embattled U.S. Forest Service contractor selected to do
the work for the 4FRI enlisted Concord early in the project.
Concord claims that it can produce jet fuel from chips for no more than $2 a gallon, but airlines testing such fuels recently have paid more than $30. Another confounding variable is that Concord isn’t sure what they would be expected to pay for a ton of wood harvested from the forest.
Regardless of the role jet fuel may play in reducing fire threats and restoring Arizona’s ecology, the program aims to reinvigorate Arizona’s timber industry to accomplish a thinning job that the federal government cannot afford to do alone.
![]() |
Jerry Nicholls, Lance Barnum and Allen Reidhead discuss logging. Mark Henle/The Republic |
The lack of progress has drawn criticism from environmentalists and county officials who support the program but questioned the contract award. This week, the Center for Biological Diversity called on the Forest Service’s inspector general to look into the contract award and potential shuffling. Forest Service officials said Wednesday that they hope to decide within a month whether to allow Pioneer to sell out.
In other developments, large log piles are sitting idle and would have been hauled off already if a Heber-area biomass electricity plant slated to receive them had reopened on schedule.
Pioneer has not disclosed the company it wants to sell its contract to, but it is incorporated in Arizona, Pioneer says the company has the money to open the $230 million Winslow mill that his company has been unable to get financing to build.
Forest Service officials also have declined to name the company.
The initiative is meant to restore about a million acres of forests to conditions approximating what they were before the last century of fire suppression. Constant firefighting has allowed young trees and brush to crowd the forest and, ironically, threaten worse fires. (The Republic/ AZCentral .com, 7/24/2013)
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Forest Service Job Corps
The Forest Service’s Job Corps curriculum expands employment opportunities for its graduates, helps revitalize local economies in rural communities and enhances the mission of the agency. According to U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell:
The Oconaluftee Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center in Cherokee, North Carolina has implemented training and conservation ideals across each of its training programs including Forestry Conservation and Wildland Firefighting, Office and Business Administration, and Health Occupations. Projects throughout western North Carolina include transplanting culturally significant rivercane with Western Carolina University in Cherokee, education trail construction with the Watershed Association for the Tuckasegee River in Dillsboro and trail revitalization on the Cheoah Ranger District in Robbinsville.
The Oconaluftee Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center is associated with the National Forests of North Carolina and currently serves 68 students. The USDA Forest Service operates 28 Job Corps Civilian Conservation Centers across 18 states with a capacity of 6,200 students.
The centers directly contribute to the agency’s mission of conserving the nation’s national forests and grasslands. Job Corps students have fought forest fires, planted trees, improved wildlife habitat and built or maintained recreation facilities and miles of hiking trails. In the last 12 months the centers have graduated 4,263 students, better preparing them to enter the job market. Historically, approximately 80 percent of Job Corps graduates have started new careers, enrolled in higher education programs or have enlisted in the military. Job Corps students are making Forest Service facilities and operations sustainable, lowering its operating costs, reducing our carbon footprint, and restoring terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
The mission of the U.S. Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. The agency manages 193 million acres of public land, provides assistance to state and private landowners, and maintains the largest forestry research organization in the world. (Cherokee One Feather, 6/11/2011)
"The Forest Service congratulates high school and college students far and wide...and we are especially proud of our own graduates of the Forest Service Job Corps centers. Our students have completed valuable, hands-on projects giving them excellent tools to pursue career paths in green jobs while also creating life-long connections with America’s great outdoors.”
The Oconaluftee Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center in Cherokee, North Carolina has implemented training and conservation ideals across each of its training programs including Forestry Conservation and Wildland Firefighting, Office and Business Administration, and Health Occupations. Projects throughout western North Carolina include transplanting culturally significant rivercane with Western Carolina University in Cherokee, education trail construction with the Watershed Association for the Tuckasegee River in Dillsboro and trail revitalization on the Cheoah Ranger District in Robbinsville.
The Oconaluftee Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center is associated with the National Forests of North Carolina and currently serves 68 students. The USDA Forest Service operates 28 Job Corps Civilian Conservation Centers across 18 states with a capacity of 6,200 students.
The centers directly contribute to the agency’s mission of conserving the nation’s national forests and grasslands. Job Corps students have fought forest fires, planted trees, improved wildlife habitat and built or maintained recreation facilities and miles of hiking trails. In the last 12 months the centers have graduated 4,263 students, better preparing them to enter the job market. Historically, approximately 80 percent of Job Corps graduates have started new careers, enrolled in higher education programs or have enlisted in the military. Job Corps students are making Forest Service facilities and operations sustainable, lowering its operating costs, reducing our carbon footprint, and restoring terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
The mission of the U.S. Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. The agency manages 193 million acres of public land, provides assistance to state and private landowners, and maintains the largest forestry research organization in the world. (Cherokee One Feather, 6/11/2011)
San Bernardino National Forest Association Urban Conservation Corps Wins U.S. Forest Service Regional Forester's Honor Award
![]() |
A picture from one of the weeks the crew was in the wilderness |
They were presented with this award for their joint efforts in developing and implementing a Wilderness Spike Crew Project that trains corpsmembers from diverse, underrepresented communities from both San Bernardino and Riverside Counties to conduct wilderness GPS monitoring, inventorying and restoration on National Forest System lands in Southern California.
The existence of a wilderness crew of urban young adults comprised of Latinos, African Americans and Pacific Islander to help manage wilderness areas by collecting data and developing and collect data on the National Forest is rare and nontraditional. This project truly embraces the spirit of promoting diversity and civil rights on National Forest System lands in Southern California.
The Urban Conservation Corps would like to thank the many supporters that continue to help provide opportunities to underserve youth so they can become employable citizens, assets to their communities and the next generation of stewards of the land. (The Corps Network)
The UCC Gave Special Thanks to:
Elwood York, U.S. Forest Service Wilderness Office, Washington D.C
Jody Noiron, Forest Supervisor San Bernardino National Forest
Tom Contreras, Forest Supervisor Angeles National Forest
L’Tanga Watson, U.S. Forest Service, Angeles National Forest
Gabe Garcia, U.S. Forest Service, San Bernardino National Forest
Larry Lawrence, Arrowhead Mountain Spring Water
Fabian Garcia, U.S. Forest Service, Southern California Consortium
Gerry Lopez, Riverside County District Attorney’s Office
Sarah Miggins, Southern California Mountains Foundation, Executive Director
The Wilderness Society
Center President on Energy Panel at CBC Institute Tunica Conference
The Congressional Black Caucus Political
Education and Leadership Institute (CBC Institute) is holding its Annual Policy Conference, TUNICA-2013. at the Mid-South Convention Center in Tunica,
Mississippi from Thursday, August 15 to Saturday, August 17 ,
2013.
Center President Norris McDonald will serve on the energy panel, Energy’s Future Impact on the American Consumer scheduled for August 16 at 4:00pm.
The Annual Policy Conference is representative of the CBC Institute’s ongoing commitment to meeting that mission. The policy sessions and working luncheons provide a perfect opportunity for a cross section of committed individuals including, community leaders, state and locally elected officials, private sector leaders, labor leaders, academics and government officials to join in discussions with Members of Congress and highly qualified issue specific experts.
The CBC Institute is a non-partisan, non-profit organization whose mission, in part, is to educate today’s voters and train tomorrow’s leaders.
Center President Norris McDonald will serve on the energy panel, Energy’s Future Impact on the American Consumer scheduled for August 16 at 4:00pm.
The Annual Policy Conference is representative of the CBC Institute’s ongoing commitment to meeting that mission. The policy sessions and working luncheons provide a perfect opportunity for a cross section of committed individuals including, community leaders, state and locally elected officials, private sector leaders, labor leaders, academics and government officials to join in discussions with Members of Congress and highly qualified issue specific experts.
The CBC Institute is a non-partisan, non-profit organization whose mission, in part, is to educate today’s voters and train tomorrow’s leaders.
EPA Software Helps Reduce Water Pollution
National stormwater calculator helps manage stormwater runoff
As part of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today released the National Stormwater Calculator, an innovative addition to the administration’s virtual climate resilience toolkit. EPA’s new calculator will help property owners, developers, landscapers, and urban planners make informed land-use decisions to protect local waterways from pollution caused by stormwater runoff. Preventing stormwater runoff, which can impact drinking water resources and local ecosystems, protects people’s health and the environment.
The calculator, which is phase I of the Stormwater Calculator and Climate Assessment Tool package announced in the President’s Climate Action Plan in June, is a desktop application that estimates the annual amount of stormwater runoff from a specific site, based on local soil conditions, slope, land cover, and historical rainfall records. Users can enter any U.S. location and select different scenarios to learn how specific green infrastructure changes, including inexpensive changes like rain barrels and rain gardens, can prevent pollution. This information helps users determine how adding green infrastructure can be one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce stormwater runoff.
The Stormwater Calculator demonstrates different types of green infrastructure approaches which can result in protection from flooding, energy savings, improved air quality, increased property values, healthier communities, and cost savings for the American people.
Each year billions of gallons of raw sewage, trash, household chemicals, and urban runoff flow into our streams, rivers and lakes. Polluted stormwater runoff can adversely affect plants, animals, and people. It also adversely affects our economy – from closed beaches to decreased fishing and hunting in polluted areas. Green infrastructure is an affordable solution to promote healthy waters and support sustainable communities.
An update to the Stormwater Calculator, which will include the ability to link to several future climate scenarios, will be released by the end of 2013. Climate projections indicate that heavy precipitation events are very likely to become more frequent as the climate changes. (EPA)
More information about the National Stormwater Calculator
More information about the virtual climate resilience toolkit
More information on EPA’s Green Infrastructure research
As part of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today released the National Stormwater Calculator, an innovative addition to the administration’s virtual climate resilience toolkit. EPA’s new calculator will help property owners, developers, landscapers, and urban planners make informed land-use decisions to protect local waterways from pollution caused by stormwater runoff. Preventing stormwater runoff, which can impact drinking water resources and local ecosystems, protects people’s health and the environment.
The calculator, which is phase I of the Stormwater Calculator and Climate Assessment Tool package announced in the President’s Climate Action Plan in June, is a desktop application that estimates the annual amount of stormwater runoff from a specific site, based on local soil conditions, slope, land cover, and historical rainfall records. Users can enter any U.S. location and select different scenarios to learn how specific green infrastructure changes, including inexpensive changes like rain barrels and rain gardens, can prevent pollution. This information helps users determine how adding green infrastructure can be one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce stormwater runoff.
The Stormwater Calculator demonstrates different types of green infrastructure approaches which can result in protection from flooding, energy savings, improved air quality, increased property values, healthier communities, and cost savings for the American people.
Each year billions of gallons of raw sewage, trash, household chemicals, and urban runoff flow into our streams, rivers and lakes. Polluted stormwater runoff can adversely affect plants, animals, and people. It also adversely affects our economy – from closed beaches to decreased fishing and hunting in polluted areas. Green infrastructure is an affordable solution to promote healthy waters and support sustainable communities.
An update to the Stormwater Calculator, which will include the ability to link to several future climate scenarios, will be released by the end of 2013. Climate projections indicate that heavy precipitation events are very likely to become more frequent as the climate changes. (EPA)
More information about the National Stormwater Calculator
More information about the virtual climate resilience toolkit
More information on EPA’s Green Infrastructure research
EPA Carbon Pollution Standards for New and Existing Power Plants
Coming Soon?
President Obama is calling for action against climate change, but the plan doesn’t go far enough to put a real dent in the greenhouse gas pollution warming the planet. The EPA is in the process of establishing carbon pollution standards for new and existing power plants.
The Center supports a cap and trade program and EPA should consider such an approach. We are also promoting a technological approach to mitigation climate change by converting CO2 into fuel.
The power plant pollution-controls and other measures the president has announced are aimed at fulfilling his administration’s pledge to put the United States on the path to cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 4 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. Such a reduction, however, would not be enough to avert catastrophic temperature rises, according to climate scientists.
A carbon cap would not require new legislation. The Obama administration could
declare carbon dioxide a “criteria pollutant” under the Clean Air Act and set a national pollution cap for CO2 at no greater than 350 parts per million (ppm).
Many scientists have concluded that atmospheric CO2 levels above 350 ppm will cause catastrophic global warming. Pollution caps could also be set for other dangerous greenhouse gases, including methane and nitrous oxide. The EPA has already set caps on other air pollutants, including carbon monoxide, lead and ozone. These national pollution caps are known as National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Once the safe level has been scientifically established, each of the 50 states develops strategies to attain the prescribed pollution caps. (The Hill, 7/23/2013)
President Obama is calling for action against climate change, but the plan doesn’t go far enough to put a real dent in the greenhouse gas pollution warming the planet. The EPA is in the process of establishing carbon pollution standards for new and existing power plants.
The Center supports a cap and trade program and EPA should consider such an approach. We are also promoting a technological approach to mitigation climate change by converting CO2 into fuel.
The power plant pollution-controls and other measures the president has announced are aimed at fulfilling his administration’s pledge to put the United States on the path to cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 4 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. Such a reduction, however, would not be enough to avert catastrophic temperature rises, according to climate scientists.
A carbon cap would not require new legislation. The Obama administration could
declare carbon dioxide a “criteria pollutant” under the Clean Air Act and set a national pollution cap for CO2 at no greater than 350 parts per million (ppm).
Many scientists have concluded that atmospheric CO2 levels above 350 ppm will cause catastrophic global warming. Pollution caps could also be set for other dangerous greenhouse gases, including methane and nitrous oxide. The EPA has already set caps on other air pollutants, including carbon monoxide, lead and ozone. These national pollution caps are known as National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Once the safe level has been scientifically established, each of the 50 states develops strategies to attain the prescribed pollution caps. (The Hill, 7/23/2013)
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Healthy Forest Management and Wildfire Prevention Act
Center Supports Congressman Scott Tipton's Legislation
Representative Scott Tipton believes the U.S. Forest Service could spend less fighting wildfires if it spent more preventing them. In 2012, the Forest Service spent $1.77 billion fighting wildfires, and $296 million removing the fuels that make Western Colorado so vulnerable. According to Tipton:
![]() |
Scott Tipton |
Congressman Scott Tipton (R-CO) is pushing the Healthy Forest Management and Wildfire Prevention Act. The bill would streamline hazardous fuels reduction projects. The bill asks for no additional money and places no requirement on state and local officials to act. It also enables governors and county commissioners to designate high-risk areas and develop emergency hazardous fuels reduction projects on federal land.
Wildfires burned 9.3 million acres in 2012, while the U.S. Forest Service only harvested approximately 200,000 acres of timber. The cost of proactive healthy forest management is far less than the cost of wildfire suppression and cleaning up the aftermath.
Representative Scott Tipton believes the U.S. Forest Service could spend less fighting wildfires if it spent more preventing them. In 2012, the Forest Service spent $1.77 billion fighting wildfires, and $296 million removing the fuels that make Western Colorado so vulnerable. According to Tipton:
“If we proactively manage our forests we can remove dead trees and re-forest areas with healthy trees that will once again absorb carbon, restore our environment to a healthy state, and protect people and communities from catastrophic wildfire.”
Proactive forest management can help prevent catastrophic wildfires. In addition to tragically taking lives and destroying property, wildfires cause significant damage to the environment including air quality, habitats and watersheds.
According to NASA, carbon dioxide emissions from wildfires have increased 240 percent across the West since the 1980s. Carbon emissions from wildfires have grown from an average of 8.8 million tons per year from 1984 to 1995, to more than 22 million tons from 1996 to 2008.
In 2006, wildfires in Idaho produced 1.6 times more CO2 than all other fossil fuel sources. In 2006 wildfire emissions accounted for 47 and 42 percent of CO2 emissions in Montana and Washington respectively.
Wildfire CO2 emissions are expected to increase by 50 percent by 2050, according to a report from researchers with the Forest Service, Auburn University and George Mason University. (Vail Daily, 7/22/2013)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)